they double down to protect their psyches from their gut instinct that they have been duped into self-annihilating through their pride, ego, and ignorance.
The key component to join the cult was fear of death.
In the sea of modern atheism (declared or de-facto), fear of death was very very powerful. Some of these who fell to the cult and the vaccine tried to mask their personal fear of death as 'civic concern' or zeal towards weaker members of society, and some believed in 'my mask/my vaccine protects others' for real, but most covidians just feared dying full stop.
It is no coincidence that a lot of the genuine opposition comes from a place of faith.
I definitely think you are on to something with this. Masking fear of death as feigned concern for others was used to justify excluding conscientious objectors to the fear-based injections, as well.
Even within communities of alleged faith, I witnessed a great sorting between those with actual faith in God and those without. I remember being a new Catechumen at the time of the March-April 2020 hysteria, and thinking "The Early Church would never have closed because of a pandemic." These people have no faith! Those with faith do not fear death. A blessing of the great sorting was that we were able to see people's true colors.
It's true. This also especially goes for 'pope' Bergoglio. The 'vaccine' could have never been an act of love (as expressed by him) given (among other things) it also came from abortion remains. Choosing to have the vax injected was, in those 'pious' cases, an act of cowardice masked as love, and that made it so much more despicable than plain cowardice. Love is another thing, and gives totally different fruits.
Aww, thanks so much, Jerome. I appreciate your contributions to this pivotal discussion as we attempt to understand how we arrived at the place we are today and how to undo the damage.
One minor correction to your footnote: I coined the term “fact-choker” probably a year or so ago in response to a CTA from bad cat about what to call fact-checkers, and I’ve been using it ever since. I don’t think Russell Brand uses that term but would love to see him and others employ it widely to bring it into the mainstream lexicon.
Thank you for the correction. When I read "fact-choker" in your article, I felt certain it was one of your linguistic creations. Then, when I clicked the link, I kept being brought to the Russell Brand video on YT. I'd love to correct the link. Can you offer me a lead to the proper link? (I'd love to correct this error in my post). The link Russell Brand link came from your Menticide article: "Big Tech gatekeepers, influencers, pushers, fact-chokers, and other colluders enlisted to control the narrative to protect the power and profits". I see now you also used the term in Good/Bad Germans, linking to https://www.acsh.org/news/2021/06/15/covid-19-misinformation-british-medical-journal-explains-trouble-fact-checkers-15604
Sorry if that was confusing. I used the term “fact-chokers” and just linked to Russell Brand’s video about exposing the biases in fact-checking. Hope that clears things up :-)
A brilliant compilation! Thank you.
The key component to join the cult was fear of death.
In the sea of modern atheism (declared or de-facto), fear of death was very very powerful. Some of these who fell to the cult and the vaccine tried to mask their personal fear of death as 'civic concern' or zeal towards weaker members of society, and some believed in 'my mask/my vaccine protects others' for real, but most covidians just feared dying full stop.
It is no coincidence that a lot of the genuine opposition comes from a place of faith.
I definitely think you are on to something with this. Masking fear of death as feigned concern for others was used to justify excluding conscientious objectors to the fear-based injections, as well.
Even within communities of alleged faith, I witnessed a great sorting between those with actual faith in God and those without. I remember being a new Catechumen at the time of the March-April 2020 hysteria, and thinking "The Early Church would never have closed because of a pandemic." These people have no faith! Those with faith do not fear death. A blessing of the great sorting was that we were able to see people's true colors.
It's true. This also especially goes for 'pope' Bergoglio. The 'vaccine' could have never been an act of love (as expressed by him) given (among other things) it also came from abortion remains. Choosing to have the vax injected was, in those 'pious' cases, an act of cowardice masked as love, and that made it so much more despicable than plain cowardice. Love is another thing, and gives totally different fruits.
I love that you know to call Bergoglio by his name.
Seems that nearly all institutions have been "penetrated" (as Klaus Schwab likes to say) by The Parasite.
By their fruits, ye shall know them.
Aww, thanks so much, Jerome. I appreciate your contributions to this pivotal discussion as we attempt to understand how we arrived at the place we are today and how to undo the damage.
One minor correction to your footnote: I coined the term “fact-choker” probably a year or so ago in response to a CTA from bad cat about what to call fact-checkers, and I’ve been using it ever since. I don’t think Russell Brand uses that term but would love to see him and others employ it widely to bring it into the mainstream lexicon.
Thank you for the correction. When I read "fact-choker" in your article, I felt certain it was one of your linguistic creations. Then, when I clicked the link, I kept being brought to the Russell Brand video on YT. I'd love to correct the link. Can you offer me a lead to the proper link? (I'd love to correct this error in my post). The link Russell Brand link came from your Menticide article: "Big Tech gatekeepers, influencers, pushers, fact-chokers, and other colluders enlisted to control the narrative to protect the power and profits". I see now you also used the term in Good/Bad Germans, linking to https://www.acsh.org/news/2021/06/15/covid-19-misinformation-british-medical-journal-explains-trouble-fact-checkers-15604
Sorry if that was confusing. I used the term “fact-chokers” and just linked to Russell Brand’s video about exposing the biases in fact-checking. Hope that clears things up :-)
I updated the footnote, removing the reference to Russell Brand and adding links to articles where I notice you using the most excellent term.
Lovely and thank you, Jerome!
Yes, I realized that you did that.