Does Blindness to Evil Damn Our Children?
"Cluster B" Blindness throws sane people under the bus for the insane
When we can’t see a danger, we fall prey to it.
Two brilliant articles, one specific and one general, illustrate this human vulnerability that has led to great suffering when not seen: (emphasis mine)
The school defended Lemieux’s “right” to bear such Brobdingnagian bazongas in front of his high school students. All staff, after all, have the right to “equitable treatment without discrimination based upon gender identity and gender expression.”
Lemieux’s monumental imitation melons are apparently an essential ingredient in creating “a positive learning environment” based on school “values” and ensuring “a safe and inclusive environment.”1
As a troll, this would udderly epic. Unfortunately, there is so far no indication that this is the case.
In other news, Katharine Birbalsingh, the headmistress of one of England’s most successful state schools, recently posted a photo of her standing next to Jordan Peterson. Just that.
One guess which of the two—Lemieux or Birbalsingh—was reported to police.
What is going on?
I’m with Josh Slocum on the transgender debate. What we are seeing here is not simply a matter of “gender dysphoria”; it is a mass manifestation of sexual and personality pathology. From autogynephilia (a fetish that involves a man being sexually abroused by the thought of being a woman) to the unstable identity of borderline personality and the cynical and self-serving manipulations of psychopathy—our public morality shifted so far over the past decade that we not only don’t recognize fairly obvious forms of psychopathology when we see them.2 We embrace them.
This is the “first criterion of ponerogenesis”1 in action.
I recommend you read the whole article. Quoting:
But aren’t all these guys simply playing dress-up? Where’s the harm in that? Sure, they may dress up like demons or comically exaggerated women, but what’s the big deal? Well, in case you haven’t noticed, it’s not just dress-up. Aside from the fact that the majority is being asked to pretend to assent to a personal and collective delusion, the transgender fantasy is part of a much wider ideology. An ideology that includes mutilating and castrating children. Our “healthcare professionals” are literally chopping off young girls’ breasts and young boys’ penises, sterilizing them, and calling it “gender-affirming care.”
And some of the surgeon-butchers are positively gleeful about it. Here’s Josh Slocum discussing Dr. Sidhbh Gallagher. Watch the first 12 minutes (then if you have time, the rest of the show, and all Josh’s other shows!).
Another set of examples, courtesy of Billboard Chris (click through to see the full thread):
This is incredibly hard to watch. Every parent needs to see this! The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia is training staff how to coerce parents to transition their child.The boy in this scenario has an eating disorder and has recently fainted, so all the staff collude how to twist mom’s arm to transition her son. They’re not interested in treating the eating disorder. They just blame gender.When thinking of these stories (along with kindergarten drag shows and demonic drag queens), an anecdote from Cleckley came to mind. A young medical doctor had written to Cleckley about an issue concerning a local 40-year-old schoolteacher in his small community of around 5,000. The man taught sixth grade, and numerous parents had complained to the doctor about his conduct with their boys. (This was sometime in the 1950s.)
The doctor had reported his findings to parents and the local school board:
Much to my surprise, the Board took no immediate action and gave the parents little if any information as to what they intended to do. The teacher was retained. Both directly and indirectly I learned that the Board felt that one of the mothers was making every effort to get rid of the teacher because she had made a complaint about his beating some of the boys. The Board was annoyed that she appeared to be meddling in their affairs, particularly as it had not been her own boy who had been hit. It appeared to me that the Board had been so impressed with this mother’s animosity toward the teacher, that they are unable to view the present case objectively. This I explained to them, and reiterated my advice as to what to do about the teacher.
What was this teacher doing? The first accounts from the boys were innocuous enough: telling them dirty stories and off-color jokes.
I advised the School Board, on the strength of these tales, that I considered no teacher is fulfilling his school responsibility when he tells his pupils stories of this type, and that I consider them unsuitable. When one of the members suggested that the boys probably hear worse than this at home, I replied that regardless of what one may think of so-called dirty stories at home, the telling of such stories and jokes by a teacher to young boys, in or out of school hours, is not only beneath the dignity of the profession, but actually a perversion of conduct.
But it wasn’t just jokes:
All three boys agreed that the teacher has a special liking for boys in and out of school, and shows it by buying them treats and inviting them to his bachelor apartment in the evening. He often scuffles with them in the apartment. One boy related that he had been “tickled all over—just anywhere he wants to grab”—and admitted to his mother that he had been handled genitally in one of these tickling episodes. Another boy said he had been kissed by the teacher in a similar episode, and knew of others who had also been kissed. On another occasion, the teacher approached a boy who happened to be leaning forward with his elbows resting on a low table. Undoing the zipper of his trousers, the teacher bent over the boy, pressing his pubic region against the boy’s buttocks, and making motions with his hips. He made no attempt to go further, but winked and spoke jokingly to the two other boys who were present and who took his action to represent some sort of sexually slanted horseplay.
I informed the Board that I do not believe these actions are just innocent sport, but that they look as if they had some motive, conscious or unconscious, and that it is of a homosexual nature. I pointed out that it is an abnormal thing to find a male teacher kissing boy students of any age. Medically my opinion is that such action is undoubtedly perverse and homosexual in its nature. I pointed out that roughing with a boy is different from tickling. Also that for a man to handle a boy genitally is a homosexual perverse act.
In other words, this man was a pedophile. But the Board wasn’t that concerned:
When the Board finally took action, it was to send a letter to the parents referring to the insinuations that they had been hearing about a certain school teacher. They told the parents that they had investigated and had decided to retain the teacher in his present position, hoping that nothing of the sort would arise again.
Sound familiar?
Cleckley then writes:
Now, what shall I, as a psychiatrist, reply to my young colleague? Shall I quote Freud’s letter as authority and tell him that what this teacher does is “nothing to be ashamed of, no vice, no degradation,” that his condition “cannot be classified as an illness” but should be considered a “variation of sexual function” shared by “many highly respected individuals of ancient and modern times . . . several of the greatest men among them”?
… Is there any psychiatrist who would differ with my opinion that it would indeed be a disastrous day for our country if physicians pronounced such a teacher as the one referred to above as normal and argued that he was well qualified for his work? Is there a psychiatrist who would knowingly permit his ten- or eleven-year-old son to be taught by a man whose sexual inclinations lead to this type of behavior, or be subjected to the influence of such entertainment in the teacher’s apartment? If such there be, I can only say that he has not benefited by his studies and that he is himself psychiatrically ill.
Oh, if only Cleckley were alive today.
What shall we do? Shall we quote Freud and the queer theorists that Lemieux and others’ affliction is “nothing to be ashamed of, no vice, no degradation,” certainly not an “illness,” and simply a natural variation of gender fluidity—one to be celebrated, in fact? Or shall we refuse to have our minds addled by the pathological persistence and controlled egotism of those who would convince us that this is all normal? That, in fact, we’re the abnormal ones?
These people need help, not a soapbox. And they certainly shouldn’t be encouraged to be around children—all in the name of creating a “safe and inclusive” environment. Those are clown words for a clown world. If you really want to keep your children safe, take such displays of pathological sexuality out of the classroom. They should be the first sign that you’re dealing with someone who is unstable, emotionally immature, socially irresponsible, and potentially dangerous.
Therapists, doctors, nurses—do your jobs. You have lost touch with reality, your behavior has become desperately illogical, and you are contributing to one of the greatest evils of our generation.
I agree with Harrison that the signs point to our blindness leading us to impose terrible suffering on innocent people by continuing to enable the fantasies of “Cluster B” people. The lower-level insane people (like the shop teacher) cause harm enough, but when we can’t see the insanity of the psychopathic parasitic poisoners behind the WEF and such, we’re enabling our own destruction.
Cluster B Blindness Always Leads to Disaster. Harrison’s prior article on this topic.
I see two things going on here at the root cause of this.
1.) The tranny is getting a lot of attention that he never got before as just an ordinary white male. Before this he was basically a nobody, ignored, rejected and not cared for by society in anyway.
2.) This is a form of white flight. Being that straight white males are the bottom of the totem pole within the antiwhite narrative, trannyism offers straight white males an escape from their "villain" status.