Was I Crazy

to Refuse the Boosters? to Question the Safety of the Injections?

Back in early 2020, when everyone in beloved (now deceased) mother’s care home were injected with the warp sped “vaccines”, my skepticism about the wisdom of taking part in the experiment was greeted with incredulity and disdain.

In the months that followed my mother appeared to suffer strokes and then a heart attack. Two wonderful members of the small care-giving staff were stricken by “sudden” life-threatening cancers. These were just coincidences, and had nothing to do with the shots.

The fact that I was unwilling to submit to the shots made me increasingly unwelcome at my mother’s home and those of my shot-boosting relatives.

Almost two years later, I read:

Where previously, the majority of nursing home workers took the shots as soon as they could:

Now only 10% are taking the so-called “boosters”.

Something changed. Peter McCullough wrote:

Given all the prior history of nosocomial spread and the mortality in nursing homes, I wonder what this abysmal uptake for boosters could be signaling. Here are some possibilities:

1. nursing home staff have witnessed COVID-19 vaccine induced deaths and serious complications

2. most workers have had COVID-19 before and or after vaccination and felt it worthless

3. staff and administration are not convinced on the regulatory approval of bivalent vaccines with no human testing

4. administration which is ubiquitously stressed with staffing shortages has quietly dropped COVID-19 vaccination to keep the workforce intact and avoid the 25% rate of incapacitation/unable to work for a few days as reported in the CDC V-Safe data.

Whatever the drivers, the booster rate of nursing home workers is the most telling statistic of the failed COVID-19 vaccination campaign. If this group cannot or will not take the shots, then no one should have to take one under any circumstance…

Another possibility is that the new “bivalent” boosters are far more dangerous than the original experimental injections, because they figured out how to make each of the new shots equivalent to ten of the original shots!

…the rate of adverse reactions for the second booster was markedly higher among participants receiving the bivalent booster dose at 84.6% (95% CI 70.3-92.8%; 33/39) compared to the monovalent 51.4% (95% CI 35.9-66.6%; 19/37) vaccine (p=0.0028). The study team found that the rate of inability to work as well as prescribed medication need increased among the participants that received the bivalent BA.4-BA.5 booster dose.

If … updated jabs still contain the original amount of the mRNA material, one shot will be equivalent to 10 original shots.

I pray our good people resist these so-called “boosters”.

And realize that it is no longer safe to trust “our” health authorities.

They are not “our” authorities, any more, folks. They work for someone, or something that is not “us”.

I pray we good people who fell out with one another around this C-19 thing can forgive one another, come together and unite to resist the evil that brought so much unnecessary harm upon us.