This argument assumes that "other types of government" are good and right, when, in fact, every government is a system of slavery. In these systems, thugs use threat of violence to (ahem) "persuade" us not only to fund their projects, but to then have us force our neighbors to do so. That is evil, regardless of the name of the faction of "government" (Republican, Democrat, Libertarian, Independent, etc.).
Also, I can't be sure because that "sexy slop" ad is small and blurry, but I would bet a paid, health-promoting and nutritious lunch that the model is a tranny. I mean, the producers even placed the coopted rainbow colors on the set as a giveaway (as they always tell us what they are doing with their occulted symbols, signs, and sigils). I have seen enough of these "trans-gendered" decepticons to spot them pretty easily.
Finally, I wholeheartedly disagree that mediatized images of "low form" "beauty" are still beauty. What they ARE are designed to stimulate the already hyper-sexualized neurons and physiological reactions programmed into human beings.
Is looking at a "sexy" woman (or a man parading as a woman) then getting horny and going to your wife to blow your wad a truly healthy form of sexuality? Ought a man not want to make love with his wife because he loves her and wants to make a family, make joy, make art with her? Does your wife experience your true love in this instance, or does she simply feel sick that she must "be there for you" because she is your wife even though you're fucking another woman (or a man) in your mind? The transference here is palpably wrong; the evildoers know that, and men ought to know that, too.
Re Love vs Transference: Great points. You once again see important points that the xeet author either does not see or is choosing to not emphasize at the moment. We all have to choose what to prioritize. I'd like to live in a world where love such as you describe is manifest! Interestingly, I believe the xeet author would also prefer to live in such a world, even though he did not prioritize asking for that in his xeet. Instead he chose to celebrate what he saw as a move from promoting blatant evil to less blatant evil. These changes we are seeing are not because the "elite" is really about the Good, the Beautiful and the True. It's because the newly circulated "elite" needs to give the appearance of being less evil than the "elite" it was to replace.
Meanwhile, we want to manifest real love in the world. We aren't putting our energy into taking control of the levers of power.
Re Government: I agree that all forms of government involve coercion, which is almost always used for exploitation by those in power. I used to think the institutionalized evil downstream of this was curable by adopting better systems of government, as envisioned by Prud'hon, Lysander Spooner, and more recently Proctor Gamble via his "Thrive" movie series. I now judge that these visions are based upon what the visionary saw as within the natural capacity of the the people. After traveling the world and also witnessing first hand what manifests when another people group move to America en mass, I now agree with Jason that culture is an outward expression of the biospirit of a people. My people are incapable of creating Japanese culture. Pakistani people will never manifest English culture. Everyone feels best in a culture that resonates with their biospirit. My biospirit would love to live in a "Thrive" culture. But I'd need to be surrounded by people like me to manifest it.
My theory is that male hypersexualization is caused in great part by the degraded "food" that has been manufactured and fed to us for a few generations now. Then it is intentionally triggered by advertisements, and (sometimes less intentionally) by women dressing "lightly," neither of which should be a problem if our hormones were not already messed with by big ag, large-scale food processors, and big pharma.
Animals in the wild eating their natural diet only get "horny" when a nearby female of their species is in heat. With humans wearing clothing, men should only get naturally aroused when their partner is unclothed and in her fertile time. Yes, domestic dogs are prone to humping legs and such, but they have been fed the same processed crap diet for generations too. It may take a few generations of proper diet to move things back to "normal" in this regard. It also may take more time grounding outdoors in nature and getting rid of cleaning chemicals and commercial personal care products. I think there was a study done with cats over several generations, feeding kibble and then feeding a raw natural diet, that showed health decline on processed food, and gradual recovery to vibrant health on fresh prey-style feeding. But sadly many men view their over-sexed "virility" as part of the essence of being a real man, which is also reinforced by society.
So to address your point, I think it's futile to expect today's men not to be heavily influenced by societal triggers of their whacked-out hormones. Women suffer from a similar thing with our hormones that have been whacked-out over the last few generations of unhealthy living, but on a monthly basis instead of constantly, and it manifests more as exaggerated emotional ups and downs rather than horniness. The emotional fallout from the way each gender is affected by environmental toxins and adulterated "food" serves to drive wedges between people who should love, understand and respect each other despite our differences. Instead we're seen as too different to understand, too hard to live with, "irrational" from the opposite gender's viewpoint, and so on. Even though many of us, I presume, "know better," our bodies are still adversely affected by disrupted hormones, which can drive us to actions that seem like a good idea at the time, but that we regret later after the hormones subside. I offer this not as an "excuse," but more as a "knowledge is power" kind of thing. We are still each responsible for our own actions, and can push through to better choices if we truly want to.
Great points, Donna. Poisoning has been weaponized against us for generations, now. The cumulative effects are hard to quantify. Hormone disruption is real. The things we can measure with numbers, e.g. Male Testosterone, indicate how much this poisoning has twisted the knobs at a primal level. With Women, hormonal "birth contol" is said by e.g. Kelly Brogan to have psych med level impact on the women who go on it. Speaking of psych meds, this another huge poisoning operation disguised as "medicine". And of course the poisoned "phoods", masquerading as foods have arguably inflected immeasurable harm. Just what causes what, to what degree, is hard to sort out. Even finding healthy "controls" is difficult these days...
I'm very interested in unpoisoning myself and others. I'd like to compare notes.
(The cat study is known as "Pottenger's cats" in WAPF circles. It showed how fake phood led to multi-generational decline in the cats, and how restoring species specific food allowed the cats to return to health over the course of several generations)
Americans are in deep hole, having been poisoned for generations. We can climb out, though, if we can throw off the poisoners. They know this. They are in a race to poison us to the point where we can't possibly throw them off. Ever more of us are noticing. Perhaps we still have a chance. I'm going for it!
Where to start? We do have a chance, but unfortunately it is not as simple as educating oneself and identifying better choices. Natural vs. conventional cleaning products, "beauty" and personal care products, and yard/garden products are a great start, and not too difficult to implement if one is willing and able to spend a little extra money (or time) to do so. Natural fiber clothing, organic where possible, is another one. We run into difficulty doing these things effectively because the "elites" are constantly watching us and "heading us off at the pass" by buying up natural and organic producers and adulterating their recipes, or redefining terms and rewriting guidelines to allow toxicity in products that began as clean and harmless.
Homemade, homegrown everything is ideal but incredibly time-consuming, requiring not just hard work and planning ahead for occasional failures, but giving up many of the mindless entertainments to which we've become addicted; not to mention living in a place where it's possible (and allowed) to grow food and herbs. Groups of like-minded people living locally and trading can help enormously, but you need to get to know and trust them individually, which takes time and patience, and you need to really understand their personal beliefs/knowledge surrounding the products or services they provide so you know if they are compatible with your own.
Diet is way more difficult since we become addicted from birth to junk food, fast food, convenience food, cooked food, and all the social interactions around eating (and drinking) that have become "traditions" involving restaurants and family events. My belief is that humans are designed/evolved to be frugivores mainly, also using vegetation to detox and add minerals. Any animal products we are "meant" to consume would be those we could acquire and eat without the aid of any technology (no weapons, shoes or clothing, knives to butcher with, vehicles, stoves, ovens or microwaves, etc.)
Today many people are giving rave reviews to the carnivore diet or keto, but my thoughts on that are that they are experiencing huge health benefits not because of all the meat they eat, but because of all the junk food, inflammatory food, and empty processed carbs they have eliminated.
Raw vegan is the gold standard in my mind (see writings by Gabriel Cousens and David Wolfe for a wealth of information on this) however fighting a lifetime of food addictions is too hard for most people. Plus, once your body is cleaner, eating "normal" food can make you sick... from mild intestinal distress to full-on purging. So... no more restaurant food or non-organic food or cooked food. Again, a local support group is very helpful but not easy to find. There are many substitutes for things like meat, dairy and other cooked foods that can be made completely raw and vegan, but gourmet food prep like that can be a full-time job. I spent an entire day making two complicated raw vegan dishes (lasagne and pecan turtle cheesecake) for my dad's birthday one year. They were gobbled up with rave reviews and astonishment that they were really truly raw, but like I said, an entire day of prep. I was only completely raw vegan for a short time, but I felt better than I had since I was a kid, and some excess weight melted off without deprivation or additional exercise. Life got in the way, I met a man who tried but could not conquer his food addictions, and I became a full-time caregiver, all of which combined to curtail my best laid plans. (I still feed my pets mostly raw, though.)
I know people who claim that eating raw dairy fresh from your family milk cow (or goat) is perfectly healthy, and those folks do seem to bemuch healthier than SAD eaters, but I come back to my "would I be able to eat this with no technology?" and just cannot see myself sucking on an animal's teat. Perhaps I take things too far with this ideology, but to achieve the pinnacle of detoxification and robust health, I still see raw vegan as "it."
I won't get into other environmental assaults on our bodies and minds since this post is long enough, except to say that I turn off my wifi/tv power strip when not in use, don't buy smart appliances, pay a bit extra for a non-smart meter for electricity, use a flip phone, and keep electronics out of the bedroom. I haven't done street or pharmaceutical drugs (except novocaine to have my few mercury fillings removed) since I was 19. I'm still torn over caffeine; I reduced coffee to a few times a month, but I love my daily camellia sinensis!
Hopefully this gives people some ideas to chew on. Please share your notes as well, or a link if you already have in other articles.
"The price of freedom is constant vigilance, and constant willingness to fight back." (The first part of that quote is attributed to Thomas Jefferson, not sure if he said the last bit or if someone else added it later.) We need to be up for the hard work of freeing ourselves while fighting not only our enemies, but our poisoned, addicted selves at the same time. Clever of those evil bastards to get our own bodies and minds to do half of their work for them!
Thank you for this deeply thought out and well written piece of advocacy for raw vegan as arguably a natural and even optimal diet.
I have a goal of starting a new stack centered around the theme of UnPoisoning. I know very little about practical vegan, much less raw vegan. I knew that many people think it is optimal.
"Know them by their fruits" is advice I take to heart, so I especially welcome raw vegan success stories, particularly those featuring long-term practitioners who manage to maintain optimal health.
I resonate with your theorizing that carnivores and ketovores report success that you judge to be more from their stopping eating the poisoned processed phoods than any benefit from eating more animal-based foods.
This resonance is because I have a similar theory about why raw vegans and vegans similarly report benefits after transitioning from a SAD diet. I feel I've been making great health strides since going plant-free 19 months ago, and transitioning to meat & microbes (adding ferments) 7 months ago.
Perhaps there is something to the theory that different body types or blood types respond better to different diets. I did the Atkins diet many years ago to lose weight, and except for the first week which I thoroughly enjoyed, I was miserable eating almost all meat. It was a struggle to lose weight despite maintaining ketosis. My body just did not thrive on a meat diet, and my kidneys began to hurt after several months stubbornly sticking to it to shed those pounds. I had no noticeable health benefits at all, just excruciatingly slow weight loss. (And if I have to supplement my diet with fiber to keep things moving, then I know I should be eating foods containing more fiber!)
However on raw vegan my body came alive, feeling more energetic, shedding that same excess weight that I had regained over the course of a year+ after stopping the Atkins diet, feeling satisfied and looking forward to eating instead of dreading how my stomach would feel queasy from eating animal fat with no carbs. My skin also recovered (tightened up) from the faster weight loss, which amazed me at my age. It took five weeks on raw vegan to lose the same excess weight (28 pounds) it had taken me a year and a half to lose doing super low carb.
An UnPoisoning stack sounds excellent! There are so many ways to approach that. I realized I'm probably doing more things toward that end than I recalled earlier. They've become second nature and go unnoticed now. Like not using a microwave, using glass or ceramic containers for food storage instead of plastic, and avoiding non-stick cookware.
Your story reminds me of others I've heard, where a dietary strategy that one person responds very well to fails for another person. Blood type differences (or something like that related to the particular evolutionary pathway of our genotype?) make sense as an explanation.
I'm personally type "O negative". Lots of us seem to thrive on meat and dairy. Probably what my ancestors adapted to. Those who adapted to a different environment likely thrive on the foods from that place.
Re Beauty: I agree with you. The forty year old who's xeets I screenshot did notice that things *seemed* to get less ugly and repulsive, while you saw that the deeper ugly remains. People who know more (e.g. the placement of fake women everywhere) see things that people who know less don't see. More generally people operate at different levels: https://tllc.com/go/OQBsUXWR5gUsZ (a popular video explaining levels, by the 40 year old who's xeets I quoted above. He does see from a high level, but he has not seen everything you've come to see.
Voluntaryist is much more accurate term. It's been slow to catch on outside of voluntaryist circles, though. We've been using it for at least 25, perhaps 35 years now.
Democrats are members of a criminal syndicate. Left is a term associated with the socialists from the 19th century. Democrats are not socialist in any sense.they are corporate stooges, just like Republicans, but playing a different role. The transgender racial politics is a psychological operation run by intelligence firms on behalf of the rich to confuse us. It is not the left either. The original left, which can be seen on rare occasions, did not embrace the hypocrisy of the Democrats or the identity gender politics of the bogus "progressives" today. In socialism in China or Russia fifty years ago strict sexual mores were critical and deviant behavior not tolerated. Better to talk about real issues and stay away from names like "leftists" that obscure.
Of course, your are right. He's still using the deceptive language our victimizers imposed on us via their manipulations. I want to change this.
And I still celebrate his genius in communicating his point that what "the left" (as the term has come to mean in today's everyman) is appealing to base envy and resentment and weaponizing this bring down the good, the beautiful and the true.
Just remember, the Bill of Rights was a codicil to a contract that, unless added, the states were not going to sign. The “rights” described in the bill were not “positive” or, in other words, something the government would give to you. They were, rather, a list of things that no government shall ever do to its citizens. To violate those restrictions would delegitimize that government. But, the argument went, “the brilliance of our Constitution’s construct is that it limits the power of the federal government to very specific things, none of which can violate these individual rights you are so worried about protecting. It goes without saying.”
“Tough shit”, was the reply, “say it anyway, or we’re not signing”.
And, “yes” Progressivism, Leftism, Communism, are all forms of a delusion for everyone not at the very top. As Lenin once said, “When the revolution comes, be sure you’re in the vanguard”. It almost worked out for him, too. 😉
What Chadlite Drawfag doesn’t get, is that the leftists don’t care that there is no movement and it was all fake. They’re fine with that, so long as they get to Kill Whitey.
This person is bonkers. The right currently seems to have entered a state where they believe that anything they imagine immediately becomes true if it is accompanied by enough spittle on the way out of their mouths. Or into their computers, I bet this guy drools all over his keyboard.
This argument assumes that "other types of government" are good and right, when, in fact, every government is a system of slavery. In these systems, thugs use threat of violence to (ahem) "persuade" us not only to fund their projects, but to then have us force our neighbors to do so. That is evil, regardless of the name of the faction of "government" (Republican, Democrat, Libertarian, Independent, etc.).
Also, I can't be sure because that "sexy slop" ad is small and blurry, but I would bet a paid, health-promoting and nutritious lunch that the model is a tranny. I mean, the producers even placed the coopted rainbow colors on the set as a giveaway (as they always tell us what they are doing with their occulted symbols, signs, and sigils). I have seen enough of these "trans-gendered" decepticons to spot them pretty easily.
Finally, I wholeheartedly disagree that mediatized images of "low form" "beauty" are still beauty. What they ARE are designed to stimulate the already hyper-sexualized neurons and physiological reactions programmed into human beings.
Is looking at a "sexy" woman (or a man parading as a woman) then getting horny and going to your wife to blow your wad a truly healthy form of sexuality? Ought a man not want to make love with his wife because he loves her and wants to make a family, make joy, make art with her? Does your wife experience your true love in this instance, or does she simply feel sick that she must "be there for you" because she is your wife even though you're fucking another woman (or a man) in your mind? The transference here is palpably wrong; the evildoers know that, and men ought to know that, too.
Re Love vs Transference: Great points. You once again see important points that the xeet author either does not see or is choosing to not emphasize at the moment. We all have to choose what to prioritize. I'd like to live in a world where love such as you describe is manifest! Interestingly, I believe the xeet author would also prefer to live in such a world, even though he did not prioritize asking for that in his xeet. Instead he chose to celebrate what he saw as a move from promoting blatant evil to less blatant evil. These changes we are seeing are not because the "elite" is really about the Good, the Beautiful and the True. It's because the newly circulated "elite" needs to give the appearance of being less evil than the "elite" it was to replace.
Meanwhile, we want to manifest real love in the world. We aren't putting our energy into taking control of the levers of power.
Re Government: I agree that all forms of government involve coercion, which is almost always used for exploitation by those in power. I used to think the institutionalized evil downstream of this was curable by adopting better systems of government, as envisioned by Prud'hon, Lysander Spooner, and more recently Proctor Gamble via his "Thrive" movie series. I now judge that these visions are based upon what the visionary saw as within the natural capacity of the the people. After traveling the world and also witnessing first hand what manifests when another people group move to America en mass, I now agree with Jason that culture is an outward expression of the biospirit of a people. My people are incapable of creating Japanese culture. Pakistani people will never manifest English culture. Everyone feels best in a culture that resonates with their biospirit. My biospirit would love to live in a "Thrive" culture. But I'd need to be surrounded by people like me to manifest it.
My theory is that male hypersexualization is caused in great part by the degraded "food" that has been manufactured and fed to us for a few generations now. Then it is intentionally triggered by advertisements, and (sometimes less intentionally) by women dressing "lightly," neither of which should be a problem if our hormones were not already messed with by big ag, large-scale food processors, and big pharma.
Animals in the wild eating their natural diet only get "horny" when a nearby female of their species is in heat. With humans wearing clothing, men should only get naturally aroused when their partner is unclothed and in her fertile time. Yes, domestic dogs are prone to humping legs and such, but they have been fed the same processed crap diet for generations too. It may take a few generations of proper diet to move things back to "normal" in this regard. It also may take more time grounding outdoors in nature and getting rid of cleaning chemicals and commercial personal care products. I think there was a study done with cats over several generations, feeding kibble and then feeding a raw natural diet, that showed health decline on processed food, and gradual recovery to vibrant health on fresh prey-style feeding. But sadly many men view their over-sexed "virility" as part of the essence of being a real man, which is also reinforced by society.
So to address your point, I think it's futile to expect today's men not to be heavily influenced by societal triggers of their whacked-out hormones. Women suffer from a similar thing with our hormones that have been whacked-out over the last few generations of unhealthy living, but on a monthly basis instead of constantly, and it manifests more as exaggerated emotional ups and downs rather than horniness. The emotional fallout from the way each gender is affected by environmental toxins and adulterated "food" serves to drive wedges between people who should love, understand and respect each other despite our differences. Instead we're seen as too different to understand, too hard to live with, "irrational" from the opposite gender's viewpoint, and so on. Even though many of us, I presume, "know better," our bodies are still adversely affected by disrupted hormones, which can drive us to actions that seem like a good idea at the time, but that we regret later after the hormones subside. I offer this not as an "excuse," but more as a "knowledge is power" kind of thing. We are still each responsible for our own actions, and can push through to better choices if we truly want to.
Great points, Donna. Poisoning has been weaponized against us for generations, now. The cumulative effects are hard to quantify. Hormone disruption is real. The things we can measure with numbers, e.g. Male Testosterone, indicate how much this poisoning has twisted the knobs at a primal level. With Women, hormonal "birth contol" is said by e.g. Kelly Brogan to have psych med level impact on the women who go on it. Speaking of psych meds, this another huge poisoning operation disguised as "medicine". And of course the poisoned "phoods", masquerading as foods have arguably inflected immeasurable harm. Just what causes what, to what degree, is hard to sort out. Even finding healthy "controls" is difficult these days...
I'm very interested in unpoisoning myself and others. I'd like to compare notes.
(The cat study is known as "Pottenger's cats" in WAPF circles. It showed how fake phood led to multi-generational decline in the cats, and how restoring species specific food allowed the cats to return to health over the course of several generations)
Americans are in deep hole, having been poisoned for generations. We can climb out, though, if we can throw off the poisoners. They know this. They are in a race to poison us to the point where we can't possibly throw them off. Ever more of us are noticing. Perhaps we still have a chance. I'm going for it!
Where to start? We do have a chance, but unfortunately it is not as simple as educating oneself and identifying better choices. Natural vs. conventional cleaning products, "beauty" and personal care products, and yard/garden products are a great start, and not too difficult to implement if one is willing and able to spend a little extra money (or time) to do so. Natural fiber clothing, organic where possible, is another one. We run into difficulty doing these things effectively because the "elites" are constantly watching us and "heading us off at the pass" by buying up natural and organic producers and adulterating their recipes, or redefining terms and rewriting guidelines to allow toxicity in products that began as clean and harmless.
Homemade, homegrown everything is ideal but incredibly time-consuming, requiring not just hard work and planning ahead for occasional failures, but giving up many of the mindless entertainments to which we've become addicted; not to mention living in a place where it's possible (and allowed) to grow food and herbs. Groups of like-minded people living locally and trading can help enormously, but you need to get to know and trust them individually, which takes time and patience, and you need to really understand their personal beliefs/knowledge surrounding the products or services they provide so you know if they are compatible with your own.
Diet is way more difficult since we become addicted from birth to junk food, fast food, convenience food, cooked food, and all the social interactions around eating (and drinking) that have become "traditions" involving restaurants and family events. My belief is that humans are designed/evolved to be frugivores mainly, also using vegetation to detox and add minerals. Any animal products we are "meant" to consume would be those we could acquire and eat without the aid of any technology (no weapons, shoes or clothing, knives to butcher with, vehicles, stoves, ovens or microwaves, etc.)
Today many people are giving rave reviews to the carnivore diet or keto, but my thoughts on that are that they are experiencing huge health benefits not because of all the meat they eat, but because of all the junk food, inflammatory food, and empty processed carbs they have eliminated.
Raw vegan is the gold standard in my mind (see writings by Gabriel Cousens and David Wolfe for a wealth of information on this) however fighting a lifetime of food addictions is too hard for most people. Plus, once your body is cleaner, eating "normal" food can make you sick... from mild intestinal distress to full-on purging. So... no more restaurant food or non-organic food or cooked food. Again, a local support group is very helpful but not easy to find. There are many substitutes for things like meat, dairy and other cooked foods that can be made completely raw and vegan, but gourmet food prep like that can be a full-time job. I spent an entire day making two complicated raw vegan dishes (lasagne and pecan turtle cheesecake) for my dad's birthday one year. They were gobbled up with rave reviews and astonishment that they were really truly raw, but like I said, an entire day of prep. I was only completely raw vegan for a short time, but I felt better than I had since I was a kid, and some excess weight melted off without deprivation or additional exercise. Life got in the way, I met a man who tried but could not conquer his food addictions, and I became a full-time caregiver, all of which combined to curtail my best laid plans. (I still feed my pets mostly raw, though.)
I know people who claim that eating raw dairy fresh from your family milk cow (or goat) is perfectly healthy, and those folks do seem to bemuch healthier than SAD eaters, but I come back to my "would I be able to eat this with no technology?" and just cannot see myself sucking on an animal's teat. Perhaps I take things too far with this ideology, but to achieve the pinnacle of detoxification and robust health, I still see raw vegan as "it."
I won't get into other environmental assaults on our bodies and minds since this post is long enough, except to say that I turn off my wifi/tv power strip when not in use, don't buy smart appliances, pay a bit extra for a non-smart meter for electricity, use a flip phone, and keep electronics out of the bedroom. I haven't done street or pharmaceutical drugs (except novocaine to have my few mercury fillings removed) since I was 19. I'm still torn over caffeine; I reduced coffee to a few times a month, but I love my daily camellia sinensis!
Hopefully this gives people some ideas to chew on. Please share your notes as well, or a link if you already have in other articles.
"The price of freedom is constant vigilance, and constant willingness to fight back." (The first part of that quote is attributed to Thomas Jefferson, not sure if he said the last bit or if someone else added it later.) We need to be up for the hard work of freeing ourselves while fighting not only our enemies, but our poisoned, addicted selves at the same time. Clever of those evil bastards to get our own bodies and minds to do half of their work for them!
Thank you for this deeply thought out and well written piece of advocacy for raw vegan as arguably a natural and even optimal diet.
I have a goal of starting a new stack centered around the theme of UnPoisoning. I know very little about practical vegan, much less raw vegan. I knew that many people think it is optimal.
"Know them by their fruits" is advice I take to heart, so I especially welcome raw vegan success stories, particularly those featuring long-term practitioners who manage to maintain optimal health.
I resonate with your theorizing that carnivores and ketovores report success that you judge to be more from their stopping eating the poisoned processed phoods than any benefit from eating more animal-based foods.
This resonance is because I have a similar theory about why raw vegans and vegans similarly report benefits after transitioning from a SAD diet. I feel I've been making great health strides since going plant-free 19 months ago, and transitioning to meat & microbes (adding ferments) 7 months ago.
Wishing you success in your health journey.
P.S. Thank you for the tips on avoiding EMF poisoning, etc., as well.
Perhaps there is something to the theory that different body types or blood types respond better to different diets. I did the Atkins diet many years ago to lose weight, and except for the first week which I thoroughly enjoyed, I was miserable eating almost all meat. It was a struggle to lose weight despite maintaining ketosis. My body just did not thrive on a meat diet, and my kidneys began to hurt after several months stubbornly sticking to it to shed those pounds. I had no noticeable health benefits at all, just excruciatingly slow weight loss. (And if I have to supplement my diet with fiber to keep things moving, then I know I should be eating foods containing more fiber!)
However on raw vegan my body came alive, feeling more energetic, shedding that same excess weight that I had regained over the course of a year+ after stopping the Atkins diet, feeling satisfied and looking forward to eating instead of dreading how my stomach would feel queasy from eating animal fat with no carbs. My skin also recovered (tightened up) from the faster weight loss, which amazed me at my age. It took five weeks on raw vegan to lose the same excess weight (28 pounds) it had taken me a year and a half to lose doing super low carb.
An UnPoisoning stack sounds excellent! There are so many ways to approach that. I realized I'm probably doing more things toward that end than I recalled earlier. They've become second nature and go unnoticed now. Like not using a microwave, using glass or ceramic containers for food storage instead of plastic, and avoiding non-stick cookware.
Your story reminds me of others I've heard, where a dietary strategy that one person responds very well to fails for another person. Blood type differences (or something like that related to the particular evolutionary pathway of our genotype?) make sense as an explanation.
I'm personally type "O negative". Lots of us seem to thrive on meat and dairy. Probably what my ancestors adapted to. Those who adapted to a different environment likely thrive on the foods from that place.
Re Beauty: I agree with you. The forty year old who's xeets I screenshot did notice that things *seemed* to get less ugly and repulsive, while you saw that the deeper ugly remains. People who know more (e.g. the placement of fake women everywhere) see things that people who know less don't see. More generally people operate at different levels: https://tllc.com/go/OQBsUXWR5gUsZ (a popular video explaining levels, by the 40 year old who's xeets I quoted above. He does see from a high level, but he has not seen everything you've come to see.
The term "Voluntaryist" is beginning to be used to avoid the negative connotations of anarchy.
Voluntaryist is much more accurate term. It's been slow to catch on outside of voluntaryist circles, though. We've been using it for at least 25, perhaps 35 years now.
Democrats are members of a criminal syndicate. Left is a term associated with the socialists from the 19th century. Democrats are not socialist in any sense.they are corporate stooges, just like Republicans, but playing a different role. The transgender racial politics is a psychological operation run by intelligence firms on behalf of the rich to confuse us. It is not the left either. The original left, which can be seen on rare occasions, did not embrace the hypocrisy of the Democrats or the identity gender politics of the bogus "progressives" today. In socialism in China or Russia fifty years ago strict sexual mores were critical and deviant behavior not tolerated. Better to talk about real issues and stay away from names like "leftists" that obscure.
Of course, your are right. He's still using the deceptive language our victimizers imposed on us via their manipulations. I want to change this.
And I still celebrate his genius in communicating his point that what "the left" (as the term has come to mean in today's everyman) is appealing to base envy and resentment and weaponizing this bring down the good, the beautiful and the true.
Hoe Math has awesome YouTube content that's how he got popular.
Just remember, the Bill of Rights was a codicil to a contract that, unless added, the states were not going to sign. The “rights” described in the bill were not “positive” or, in other words, something the government would give to you. They were, rather, a list of things that no government shall ever do to its citizens. To violate those restrictions would delegitimize that government. But, the argument went, “the brilliance of our Constitution’s construct is that it limits the power of the federal government to very specific things, none of which can violate these individual rights you are so worried about protecting. It goes without saying.”
“Tough shit”, was the reply, “say it anyway, or we’re not signing”.
And, “yes” Progressivism, Leftism, Communism, are all forms of a delusion for everyone not at the very top. As Lenin once said, “When the revolution comes, be sure you’re in the vanguard”. It almost worked out for him, too. 😉
Yes, a crime to rob us.
Yes he is. Interestingly I watched his videos already before waking up truly, sort of a remote wake-up call.
Hoe math makes some excellent points, and does it rather well, although I think he goes too far lumping all liberals in with the farcical woke crowd.
What Chadlite Drawfag doesn’t get, is that the leftists don’t care that there is no movement and it was all fake. They’re fine with that, so long as they get to Kill Whitey.
It’s The Jews.
This person is bonkers. The right currently seems to have entered a state where they believe that anything they imagine immediately becomes true if it is accompanied by enough spittle on the way out of their mouths. Or into their computers, I bet this guy drools all over his keyboard.
Quite right DB. And there's usually a good deal of resentment and envy behind their ideology.